NPS vs Time-to-depth: What you should look at when analyzing with Stockfish
Por um escritor misterioso
Descrição
What's important: nodes per second or time to depth? Here's how more CPUs impact engines and why higher NPS doesn't mean higher depth for Stockfish.
UCI Engine for Komodo 8 and Stockfish 5 spewing odd scores for mainlines. - Chess Forums
How do I use the analysis output of a UCI engine? - Chess Stack Exchange
NPS vs Time-to-depth: What you should look at when analyzing with Stockfish
engines - How do I get Stockfish to write its analysis to a file using a batch file on Windows? - Chess Stack Exchange
Stockfish evaluation at depth 50 on all possible initial opening moves - Chess Forums - Page 2
This puzzle was given to Magnus, its one of the hardest mate in two puzzles ever, its so difficult that my low depth stockfish didn't even see the first move until I
Stockfish needs better eval, not better search
Stockfish: Depth vs. TC
Simple chess questions :: Roberto Vaccari
Stockfish will analyze a chess position through to (for example) depth 45 and announce a mate in 10. When it reaches depth 56 it finds an improvement, to mate in 9. Why
AlphaZero (Computer) vs Stockfish (Computer) (2017)
SF needs to stop suiciding! · Issue #2620 · official-stockfish/Stockfish · GitHub
Chess application for Ipad - Stockfish Chess
Behind the Numbers: Understanding Chess Engine Evaluations
GUIDE: Setting up Leela on a Chess GUI. - Leela Chess Zero